Keeping clients' computers safe and profitable for over 30 years | |||
Home Forms About Current Newsletter subscribe Search All Articles
Browse by Category
|
Artificial intelligence, Chatbots, AI Writing, AI SearchPreview:
Is AI (artificial intelligence) the next electricity or the end of the world? How can you experiment with it? What can it do for you now? What are its benefits and problems? All this is in one short article. Last month I wrote an article on AI art and described how I use it. For example, I did the picture above for this article with Playgroundai. This month I'll delve into AI writing and search.
A Couple Odd SamplesI normally use ChatBots as search enhancements, and will discuss that. But hopefully, to catch your attention early, I'll try and make the bots be creative and give you examples of my interactions with Youchat and ChatGPT. I'll follow it with more useful examples. But these examples give you some idea of where this AI stuff is headed.
Me:Tell me a very short story with a moral about a hummingbird on trial for eating a worm when starving. His judge is a cat.
Youchat wrote:
ChatGPT Wrote:
After that answer, I followed up with ChatGPT and asked: but isn't it against the laws of nature for hummingbirds to eat worms? They're supposed to suck flowers.
It answered:
I ask: Tell me a joke about a spider and an octopus who walk into a bar.
ChatGPT Wrote:
Youchat wrote:
I said, That wasn't funny. Try again
It wasn't any better.
So I asked:
Are you likely to develop a better sense of humor soon?
to which it replied:
I didn't know that free chatbots could perform like this. However, that's not an important usage yet, just a catchy one.
Overview of Usage AreasHere are some areas AI writing is performing amazingly.
Search: AI Chat in OperationHere's where I find this technology to be useful. I setup some tests to show you what it does well and where it fails. I posted the same questions in You.com's chat and OpenAI's ChatGPT so I could compare answers.
I asked: Who is G. K. Chesterton?
Youchat: Gave me a clean one paragraph answer. If I'd asked for 3 paragraphs, the answer would be more complete. It was a good answer.
ChatGPT: A slightly better answer.
I asked:Describe his philosophy. Notice that I didn't need to say whose philosophy. You can interact and follow-up on discussions just like with people.
Youchat: Gave me a nice 1 paragraph answer. When I asked it to expand on that and give me 3 paragraphs, it gave me a larger paragraph which, while sounding good, wouldn't help someone understand. When I asked for more depth, it answered that it was still learning and couldn't explain more.
ChatGPT: Got a much more detailed 3 paragraph answer. OpenAI trained ChatGPT on a larger data set.
I asked: How did he defend Original Sin?
Both systems gave me good answers.
Both chatbots wrote their answers well and appeared to be real experts.
Now I decided to push them beyond what I thought they could do, so I asked:Did Vivekananda accept the Samkhya idea of multiple purushas?
This is a rather esoteric Indian philosophy question. Youchat's answer was entirely wrong. But it wrote in an authoritative manner that was believable. We need to be careful with these bots, and with every other source of information as well. There was an online lecture Swami Vivekananda gave on Samkhya and perhaps Youchat drew the false conclusion he was a Samkhyist. When using these bots, remember they can be wrong. ChatGPT gave me 4 paragraphs about half of which were incorrect.
I followed that up with another esoteric question: Explain the difference between Advaita and Samkhya. Youchat told me it was still learning and that was beyond its ability. ChatGPT gave me an excellent 6 paragraph answer.
I followed those up with these questions they both answered well.
Both got these right and explained the three types of windows and the functioning of triple pane windows.
Finally, I asked them both for two recipes for oatmeal cottage cheese pancakes and got what appear to be good answers. However YouChat only gave me one recipe!
I said, That was only one recipe.
YouChat responded: Sorry about that! Here is another recipe for oatmeal cottage cheese pancakes
In the new recipe, it replaced the maple syrup from the first recipe with 1/2 teaspoon of vanilla extract and 2 tablespoons of honey.
Both bots suggested using fruit in the mix and making sure the rolled oats were ground well before making the pancakes. I hadn't done that.
Conclusion: As long as you don't ask questions that are too esoteric, these bots give excellent answers and an excellent summary of important points.
The Problems With Chat SearchOn the page with their bot, You.com says, "This product is in beta and its accuracy may be limited. You.com is not liable for content generated. "
Of course incorrect information is a problem with the life in general, not just the Internet, bots and government. Much of our news coverage in the last few years reported incorrect "facts". One of my favorite examples is a 1920 article by the NY Times called "A Severe Strain on Credulity" ridiculing the notion that rockets could go to the moon. To imagine that once the rocket left our air, they said, it would have nothing to push against and so couldn't accelerate or change direction. "To claim that it would be, is to deny a fundamental law of dynamics...". They did retract this in 2001, 32 years after Neil Armstrong walked on the moon.
In general, I feel pretty comfortable with information which is widely known and discussed, just not by me. I'll be getting a consensus Internet opinion. But when things get fairly esoteric or you ask about things few people are interested in, it might give false results, just like a search could.
How to Use ChatGPT and YouChatFor ChatGPT you need an Openai account. Once you have the account, you can log in and use their ChatGPT for free. For now, YouChat is simply part of the You.com search engine. You.com search has become my favorite search engine. It is privacy centered like DuckDuckGo but is prettier, and has a neat writing and chatbot. I expect to do an article on it next month.
More Information
Date: January 2023
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. |
||
|